top of page

The Gap Between Fashion's Message and the Customer

Apr 17
3 min read

Sustainability is everywhere in fashion right now.

On labels. In campaigns. Across store windows and social feeds.

But the question I keep coming back to is a simple one:

Who is it actually for?

Because after years of working on the shop floor — creating the displays, setting the scenes, watching customers walk in and walk out — I have seen how sustainability is communicated. And more importantly, how it is received.


The two do not always match.


Brands today are saying all the right things.

"Conscious collections."

"Responsible sourcing."

"Better materials."

In the European Union, this messaging is now being pushed toward real accountability. From 2026, companies can no longer destroy unsold clothing and must publicly report what happens to excess stock. New regulations require brands to justify their sustainability claims rather than simply make them.


On paper, this is significant progress.


But here is the uncomfortable truth — a new peer-reviewed study published this month found that major apparel brands have consistently emphasised environmental progress over labour conditions in their sustainability reports across a decade of reporting.

In other words, brands are getting better at talking about the planet. They are still largely silent about the people making the clothes.

Communication does not end when a campaign launches. It ends when a customer understands it. And that is a very different thing.

“What’s Really Happening”

The reality behind the messaging is more complicated than the campaigns suggest.

Major brands are beginning to reframe sustainability as a core business priority.


A recent industry whitepaper led by H&M, in collaboration with EY, emphasised that decarbonisation must move beyond marketing and become a financial and operational strategy.

At the same time, regulatory and economic pressures are shifting the landscape. Discussions around easing ESG reporting requirements in parts of Europe have raised concerns about whether brands will maintain momentum on climate commitments without strong policy enforcement.


And scrutiny is intensifying across the industry. Investigations into supply chains have placed major luxury houses—including Dior, Valentino, and Giorgio Armani—under pressure, challenging long-held assumptions that sustainability issues are limited to fast fashion.



What Customers Actually Hear?


On the shop floor, things look very different.

Customers don’t read sustainability reports.They don’t track carbon targets or supply chain audits.


They pick up a garment, check the price tag, and ask three simple questions:

“Why is this more expensive?”

“What makes this better?”

“Is it actually worth it?”


And far too often, the answers aren’t clear enough.


This is where the real disconnect lives.


Sustainability in fashion has been built as a top-down conversation:

  • Brands create the message

  • Marketing teams shape the narrative

  • Stores present the outcome


But the customer experiences it from the bottom up:

  • Through price

  • Through feel

  • Through immediate understanding


If those two perspectives don’t meet somewhere in the middle, the message gets lost entirely.

At the same time, customer behaviour is evolving in its own way. The growth of secondhand fashion and resale platforms is influencing traditional retail, with even charity retail in the UK seeing increased engagement. Customers are finding their own path toward circular consumption—often independently of brand messaging.


Meanwhile, Uniqlo is launching a Europe-wide campaign this April called "LifeWear for a Lifetime," partnering with an innovation company to encourage customers to actively extend the life of their clothing — a rare example of a brand making the message practical and personal rather than abstract.


These are the moments that work. Not a campaign. A conversation.

This is where the shop floor matters most — not just as a place to sell, but as a place to translate.


Because sustainability does not need more complexity. It needs clarity, honesty and relevance in the small moments that actually reach people — a conversation with a customer who asks why something costs more, a label that explains itself simply, a display that does not overpromise what is behind it.


I have stood in those moments. I have watched customers leave unconvinced — not because they did not care, but because nobody made it make sense for them.

The shift the industry needs isn’t a bigger campaign or a more polished report.

It’s a move from impressing customers to informing them.


From making sustainability look good to making it feel true.

Because right now, there is still a gap—between:

-What brands are saying

-What customers are understanding

-And what the industry is actually doing

Closing that gap isn’t just a marketing challenge.

It’s a communication challenge.

And it starts on the shop floor.

Sustainability isn’t just about what brands say.

It’s about what customers understand.

And maybe the real shift isn’t in making fashion more sustainable—but in making sustainability make sense.


I have spent years creating what fashion wants you to see.

Now I am more interested in what it does not show.

— Stole My Heart

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page